Legal Opinion

Lane v. Cole

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 2000No. CIV. A. 99-2463PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WALDMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs assert federal claims against defendants under the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. Plaintiffs Lane and McQueen also assert state law claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress against defendants, and plaintiff Lane asserts state law claims for assault and battery against defendant John Cole. Presently before the court is defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint.

Defendants seek dismissal of the Fair Housing Act claims of plaintiff McQueen and on behalf of Jamal and Harris, and dismissal of the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cox v. City of Dallas TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. BROWN v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. CONCEPCION v. BECKDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. EL v. PEOPLE'S EMERGENCY CENTERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Helbling v. PebblesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API