Legal Opinion

Vickers v. Lowe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2011No. 36619PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature of the Case

Kirby Vickers challenges the Idaho Transportation Department’s (ITD) decision to grant his neighbor, Dr. Edward Savala, a permit to expand an encroachment onto Highway 55. This permit is conditioned on Dr. Savala implementing certain additional safety features. Vickers claims that the ITD is not authorized to issue conditional-encroachment permits and that the new approach would impermissibly degrade highway safety. We affirm the conditional permit because it complies with the ITD’s safety regulations.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

Dr. Edward…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Neighbors for a Healthy Gold Fork v. Valley CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Lane Ranch Partnership v. City of Sun ValleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Lochsa Falls, L.L.C. v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Westway Construction, Inc. v. Idaho Transportation DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Smith v. Washington County IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jasso v. CAMAS COUNTYIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Rangen, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Rangen, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  4. William Thomas McFarland v. Michael S. PembertonTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
  5. City of Blackfoot v. Gary SpackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API