Legal Opinion · Dissent

Breuhan v. Plymouth-Canton Community Schools

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1984No. Docket 75055Published

1DissentMackenzie, P.J.

I respectfully dissent. The State Tenure Commission has adhered to the anniversary-date method of computing the probationary period since 1950, see Davis v Harrison Community Schools Bd of Ed, 126 Mich App 89, 94; 342 NW2d 528 (1983), and I agree with other panels of this Court which have endorsed that method, Davis, supra, p 96; Cadillace Area Public Schools Bd of Ed v Ward, 134 Mich App 811; 351 NW2d 873 (1984). Clearly, there is a need for a workable method of computation which can be easily applied and which will have fairly predictable results. I believe the anniversary-date method…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blurton v. Bloomfield Hills Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Davis v. Harrison Community Schools Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Cadillac Area Public Schools Board of Education v. WardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API