Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Montessori Regional Charter School v. Millcreek Township School District

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 2012Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION by

President Judge PELLEGRINI.

While I agree with the majority that the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County (trial court) properly exercised jurisdiction *204over this matter as an appeal of the adjudication of a local agency,1 I respectfully dissent because the Charter School Law (CSL)2 does not empower Montessori Regional Charter School (Montessori) to amend its charter to operate its regional charter school3 at more than one facility or empower the Erie and Millcreek School Districts (Districts) to permit a Montessori to operate its regional charter school at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Pittsburgh v. SilverCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Merrell v. Chartiers Valley School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API