Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Loomis

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 21, 1893Published

Appeal from Folk District Court. — Hon. W. F. Conbad, Judge. Action to recover the possession of a horse. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal. —

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

— The petition alleges that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of the horse in controversy; that it is of the value of one hundred dollars; that possession thereof has been demanded; and that it is wrongfully detained by 'the defendants. Judgment for the horse or its value, is asked. The answer contains a general denial, and alleges that the plaintiff executed to Hewitt Bros, a chattel mortgage on the horse for fourteen dollars and seventy cents; that thereafter the defendant, the Union Mercantile Company, purchased the mortgage, took possession of the horse, and kept it, on expense, at a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hawkeye Insurance Co. v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API