Glymph v. Smith, Comptroller
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice StabeEr.
It is sought in this case to have an Act of the General Assembly (38 Statutes at Targe, p. 28), approved February 4, 1933, declared unconstitutional, and the defendants enjoined from using funds of Oconee County for the support and maintenance of any Court created thereby.
The Act in question purports to establish a Civil and Criminal Court “for that portion of Oconee County bounded by the Seneca River and its headwaters, the North Carolina line, Chattooga River and the Tugaloo River, and the Anderson County line” (Section 1).- The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Columbia v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
- City of Greenville v. FosterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
- Grimball v. C. W. Parham Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
3Cited by3 opinions
- Holloway v. HollowaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- Cothran v. MallorySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Marshall v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962