Legal Opinion

Di Massa v. Great American Novelty Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 24, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

The principal object of this bill in equity is to set aside a transfer by the plaintiff, Di Massa, of one hundred sixteen shares of the capital stock of the Great Ameri*2can Novelty Company to the defendant Mary Cohn on October 28, 1939, on the ground that he was induced by duress to enter into an agreement on that date which included the making of said transfer. The plaintiff appealed from a decree dismissing the bill.

Di Massa, in 1922, began to manufacture celluloid toys and novelties; he then formed a partnership with his cousin, the defendant Ciampa, and they conducted the business until…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. City of Boston v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Graustein v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Carey v. FitzpatrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Blair's Foodland Inc. v. Shuman's Foodland, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Russell v. MeyersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Williams v. B & K Medical Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API