Legal Opinion

Barnes v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for nonsuit, made at close of the evidence, hut decision reserved, pursuant to section 1187 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff had a verdict.

1Opinion of the CourtRogkebs, J.

This action was brought to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff, on the evening of Rovember 27, 1902, by slipping upon grease or oil on the platform of defendant’s passenger station, while alighting from one of its cars, at the city of Syracuse.

At this city: the defendant maintains a train shed about 700 feet long and 80 feet wide, covering several tracks that at this point run east and west. Between the tracks is an asphalt platform, the top of which is eight to ten inches above the top, and from sixteen to twenty inches outside, of the rail, making a convenient,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Griffen v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. McDonald v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Mullen v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Searles v. . Manhattan Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Lafflin v. . Buffalo Southwestern R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RoseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Denver City Tramway Co. v. HillsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  3. Binswanger v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API