Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Hollandsworth

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1980No. 12747Published

1Opinion of the Court

616 P.2d 1058 (1980)

101 Idaho 522

Dolores V. ROBERTS and Hugh H. Roberts, Jr., husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Oren W. HOLLANDSWORTH and Grace Hollandsworth, husband and wife, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 12747.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

September 5, 1980.

David H. Maguire, Ben Peterson, Kenneth E. Lyon, Jr., Hugh C. Maguire, Pocatello, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Gardner W. Skinner, Jr., and David W. Cantrill of Cantrill & Skinner, Phillip M. Barber and Merrily Munther of Elam, Burke, Evans, Boyd & Koontz, Boise, for defendants-respondents.

BAKES, Justice.

Plaintiff appellants Roberts appeal…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Huron Holding Corp. v. Lincoln Mine Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Hunt v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Hancock National Bank v. FarnumSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API