Legal Opinion

Cramlett v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 1990No. 58359PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Movant seeks post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 from two concurrent ten year sentences imposed after movant pled guilty on two counts of the felony of sale of a controlled substance, marijuana, in violation of § 195.020 RSMo 1986, now repealed.

Movant entered his pleas on the day his cause was set and ready for trial. At the plea hearing, the state announced the evidence would show the following at trial. On December 28, 1988, state’s confidential informant was referred to movant’s home by a third person for the purpose of buying marijuana. The informant went to mov-ant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Young v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. DriverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. Fox v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Boxx v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Hamilton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. HurttMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API