People v. Thai Huu Hoang
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
Introduction
Defendant Thai Huu Hoang was convicted of attempted premeditated murder, based on the natural and probable consequences doctrine. The jury found that by aiding and abetting an assault with a deadly weapon by a gang member, defendant was also liable for attempted premeditated murder—the natural and probable consequence of the assault. We affirm.
Defendant argues the trial court should not have instructed the jury on the natural and probable consequences doctrine because there was insufficient evidence he aided and abetted the requisite target offense. Given the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. KraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. SmitheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. PrettymanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ratliff v. HedgepethDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- (HC) Gutierrez Jr. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (HC) Johnson v. AllenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Nanton v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
- P. v. Beltran CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.