Legal Opinion
In re Essure Product Cases
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 2023No. A166579Published
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 12/22/23 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE In re ESSURE PRODUCT CASES. LHC GROUP, INC., A166579 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Alameda County Super. Ct. BAYER CORPORATION, No. RG16804878) Defendant and Respondent. LHC Group, Inc. (LHC) is the administrator of a self-insured employee welfare benefit plan, LHC Group Benefit Plan (Plan), which is governed by the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). ( 29 U.S.C. § 1001.) LHC — on behalf of itself and as a subrogee of Plan…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.