Legal Opinion

Shirk v. City of Lancaster

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County

Decided June 4, 1932Published

1Opinion of the Court

Groff, P. J.,

The pleadings in this case consist of a bill in equity, filed April 29, 1931, and an amendment thereto, filed June 6, 1931, wherein Frank G. Shirk, a resident of the City of Lancaster, is the plaintiff, and the City of Lancaster, a municipality of the third class, is the defendant.

On July 15,1931,' an answer was filed to the said bill in equity by the defendant, and the issues raised in said pleadings are as follows:

1. Are the water rates fixed by the City of Lancaster reasonable?

2. Can the surplus over and above the cost of operating the water supply system of Lancaster be used…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Aniline Products, Inc. v. Lock HavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Barnes Laundry Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Jolly v. Monaca BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Rieker v. City of LancasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. City of Pittsburgh v. PhelanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API