Legal Opinion

In Re Attorney General of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided April 5, 2005No. 14-04-01073-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Office of the Attorney General seeks mandamus relief from a trial court order reinstating a paternity action. Because the trial court abused its discretion, we conditionally grant the petition for writ of mandamus.

Background

In November 2002, the attorney general filed a petition to establish a parent-child relationship. The purported father, Thomas Gasaway, the real party in interest here, did not file an answer. In December 2002, the trial court signed an order for parentage testing, which also set a trial date for March 20, 2003. The parentage test showed Gasaway could not be…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re Masonite Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cherokee Water Co. v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. in the Interest of G. S. G., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Public Safety v. J.H.J., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  2. Charlton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  3. Bayport Polymers LLC D/B/A Baystar v. CB&I LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2024
  4. Texas Department of Public Safety v. J.H.J., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  5. in the Interest of A.R.C, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API