Legal Opinion

Freese v. United States

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided January 13, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 68-C-247PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS. OF LAW

BARROW, Chief Judge.

This matter was tried before the Court without a jury on December 7, 8, and 9, 1970, at Tulsa, Oklahoma. After considering the pleadings, stipulations of the parties, testimony, documents, and arguments of counsel, the Court makes and enters its findings of fact and conclusions of law as follows:

Findings of Fact

1. This is a refund suit brought by Dorothy M. Freese, individually and as Executrix of the Estate of M. Lloyd Freese, deceased, plaintiff,* against the United States of America, defendant, for the recovery of income taxes and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Gillette Motor Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Harrison E. Spangler and Myrtle B. Spangler v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. General Artists Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  4. United States v. Charles G. Eidson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  5. Nat Holt and Blanche Holt, Husband and Wife v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. M. Lloyd Freese and Dorothy M. Freese v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  2. In Re Canadian Pacific LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Rothstein v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  4. Rothstein v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API