Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Rotary Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This demurrer to the amended complaint was well taken. An alleged promise to hold land and then to reeonvey on request, resting wholly in parol, is within the Statute of Frauds. (Real Prop. Law, § 242;* 20 Cye. 233 (e).) Even if in writing, such a *908promise to reconvey would not be specifically enforced for the reason that it was unilateral, as plaintiffs do not show that they agreed to take back the property. (Levin v. Dietz, 194 N. Y. 376; Riker v. Comfort, 140 App. Div. 117.) These appellants cannot avail themselves of the alleged usury in giving a mortgage before they acquired the property.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Levin v. . DietzNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Riker v. ComfortAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schultze v. Hudson Counties Title & Mortgage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API