Legal Opinion

Emil v. the Mississippi Bar

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1997No. 94-BA-00749-SCTPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

690 So.2d 301 (1997)

Gerald R. EMIL

v.

THE MISSISSIPPI BAR.

No. 94-BA-00749-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

January 9, 1997.

William Liston, Liston & Lancaster, Winona; James Duke Cameron, Phoenix, AZ, Kendall Reeves, Davis & Emil, Gulfport, for Appellant.

Michael B. Martz, Jackson, for Appellee.

En Banc.

SULLIVAN, Presiding Justice, for the Court:

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The Mississippi Bar through the office of its General Counsel brought this disciplinary matter against Gerald R. Emil under the provisions of the Rules of Discipline for the Mississippi State Bar. The matter was initiated on or about…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Banks; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Banks.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mitchell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Levi v. Mississippi State BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Foote v. Mississippi State Bar Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Myers v. Mississippi State BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1985

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McGilberry v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. McDerment v. Mississippi Real Estate Com'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Holland v. MayfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Liebling v. the Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Byrd v. the Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API