Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ex parte L.R.B.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 16, 2016No. 1151096Published

1ConcurrenceParker, Justice

I concur with the 'decision to quash 'the writ under the facts of this case because the petitioner failed to raise below the precise argument he now raises. Nonetheless, I write specially because this case presents an important issue: Whether a presumed father persists in his status as the legal father of a child after he consents to the termination of his parental rights.

The child’s mother was married to M.H. when , the child was bom. However, while M.H. was in prison, the mother had a relationship with L.R.B. Shortly after the child was born, both the mother and M.H. consented to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Ex Parte PresseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. R.W. v. T.J.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  4. L.R.B. v. Talladega County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API