Imperial Lumber Co. v. James Knowles, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We have examined the record, the briefs and particularly the final judgment entered by the trial judge and note that the judgment comes to this court clothed with a presumption of correctness. We observe that appellate courts cannot substitute their judgment for that of the trial court and no reversible error having been made to appear the judgment is therefore affirmed, including paragraph six of the final judgment.
PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Horatio Enterprises, Inc. v. RabinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Benedict v. Dade County Realty, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Banco Do Brasil v. City Nat. BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Villa v. Mumac Construction Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.