Marshall v. Woodbury Banking Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
¡Complaint; from city court of Greenville — Judge Revill. August 27, 1909.
1Opinion of the Court
(Russell, J.
A verdict for tlie plaintiff was not demanded by tlie evidence, and the court erred in directing- tlie verdict. In any case where the evidence may he subject to more than one construction, or where more than one inference may be drawn, even from undisputed facts, the duty of solving the mystery should! be placed upon the jury.
Judgment reversed.
2Cited by11 opinions
- McCarty v. National Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Reaves v. Columbus Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Northwestern University v. CrispSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Sherman v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Owens v. Georgia Power CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.