Legal Opinion

Lincoln Fire Insurance v. Hurst

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 17, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

Frank E. Welles sold to Ernest Hurst a certain lot together with materials for building a house thereon under a conditional sales contract. The purchaser was a carpenter who erected the house and thereupon the agent of plaintiff in error solicited Hurst to write insurance on the house and the furniture in the house. The agent inspected the house and wrote a policy in the sum of $1,250.00 in s'uring the house against loss by fire, the insurance payable to Frank E. Welles and Ernest Hurst.

While the policy was in force the house and furniture were destroyed by fire. After the fire occurred there…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commercial Fire Ins. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  2. Phenix Insurance v. HilliardSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. EricksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  4. Prsdt. and Directors of Balto. Fire Ins. Co. v. LoneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
  5. McLaughlin v. Washington County Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1840

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. General Exchange InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. The Homestead Fire Ins. Co. v. Andian Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. Allstate Insurance v. DoradoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. SteinhardtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API