Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Layson Bros.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 20, 1914No. 5152PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Sparta — Judge Moore. July 17, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.

The plaintiff hired a horse and a buggy from the defendants. The buggy and the harness were free from defects. The driver who went with the plaintiff was careful and experienced. Shortly after the journey began, and without any apparent cause, the horse began to kick and run, and as a result the plaintiff either fell or was thrown out of the buggy and was injured. On proof of this the plaintiff rested his case. The defendant contends that even if the horse was vicious and dangerous, proof of the scienter was necessary to enable the plaintiff to recover. Counsel for the plaintiff insist that…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Chandler v. GatelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Smith v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Harris v. Breezy Point Lodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. McCree v. BurksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Queen v. Patent Scaffolding Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API