Myers v. Kelsey
New York Supreme Court
BY Virtue of a fieri facias issued on a judgment entered up by the President and Directors of the Manhattan Company against K., the defendant, on the 20th October, 1817, the sheriff of the county of Dutchess advertised and sold a house and lot belonging to the defendant, in Poughkeepsie, at public auction, on the 25th of November, 1819. Peter 1 Flaglee became the purchaser thereof, at such sale : and a 1 . deed was executed by the sheriff to him, in the usual form, A fieri…
Read the full summary
BY Virtue of a fieri facias issued on a judgment entered up by the President and Directors of the Manhattan Company against K., the defendant, on the 20th October, 1817, the sheriff of the county of Dutchess advertised and sold a house and lot belonging to the defendant, in Poughkeepsie, at public auction, on the 25th of November, 1819. Peter 1 Flaglee became the purchaser thereof, at such sale : and a 1 . deed was executed by the sheriff to him, in the usual form, A fieri facias in debt on scire facias against the defendant, nt the suit of M., the plaintiff, was delivered to the sheriff of…
1Per curiam
We do not think proper to decide on the rights of these parties, in this summary way; but F., the purchaser under the execution in favour of the Manhattan Company, must be left to his remedy by action.
Motion denied.
2Cited by1 opinion
- State v. BordenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887