Legal Opinion

Meeks v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 4, 1986No. 2-85-138-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FENDER, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from appellees’ recovery of treble damages under the 1973 version of the Deceptive Trade Practices— Consumer Protection Act caused by fire destruction of their home and its contents on April 4,1982. The heat pump alleged to be responsible for the fire had been sold and installed by appellant, Meeks, for a previous owner of the premises on February 28, 1977. We reverse and render judgment for appellant.

The cause, filed in 1982, proceeded to a jury trial in 1985 upon the Bells’ allegations of negligence and breach of express and implied warranty.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. La Sara Grain Co. v. First National Bank of MercedesTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Harkey v. Texas Employers InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. G-W-L, Inc. v. RobichauxTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Vermillion v. HaynesTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Gupta v. Ritter Homes, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Poe v. Hutchins, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  2. Bell v. MeeksTexas Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API