Legal Opinion

Bodyslimmer, Inc. v. Sanford

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1990No. A90A1455PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

Appellant/defendant BodySlimmer, Inc., appeals from the grant of appellee/plaintiff Suzanne Sanford’s motion for partial declaratory judgment which, in effect, was a motion for partial summary judgment on the effectiveness of a release signed by Sanford purporting to exculpate BodySlimmer from damages for negligence. The trial court found that the release was ambiguous and therefore was not a bar to Sanford’s action for negligence. The trial court further found that the release was void as against public policy.

The pertinent facts of this case are as follows: Sanford went to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Emory University v. PorubianskySupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Porubiansky v. Emory UniversityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. My Fair Lady of Georgia, Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Lovelace v. Figure Salon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Day v. Fantastic Fitness, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tiismann v. Linda Martin Homes Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  2. Wright v. Safari Club International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Frederick Copeland v. Healthsouth/Methodist Rehabilitation Hospital, LPTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Joseph Jerry Wright v. Waterberg Big Game Hunting Lodge Otjahewita (Pty), Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API