Legal Opinion

State v. Faulk

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Butte County. Hon. William G. Rice, Judge. Herbert Faulk was convicted of grand larceny, and appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

CORSON, J.,

Upon an information filed by the staters attorney of Butte county the defendant was fried -and convicted of the crime of grand larceny. When the case was called,, for trial, the defendant objected to the introduction of any evidence under the information on various grounds, but the objection was overruled, and the defendant excepted. Subsequently on the rendition of the verdict, the defendant moved upon 'substantially the same grounds in arrest of judgment and 'for a new trial, which were denied, and the defendant thereupon appealed to- this court.

Numerous errors are assigned, but…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rema v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Chesnut v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  3. State ex rel. Kotilinic v. SwensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Lopez v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Territory of Montana v. PendryMontana Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ViolettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Luther M. Powell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. State v. BroomOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Albritton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  5. Emery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API