Legal Opinion

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Rhodes

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 10, 1895No. 398PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas.

1Opinion of the Court

BOARMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff below filed his original suit in the district court of Callahan county, Tex., and it was subsequently removed by the defendant to the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Texas. Therein judgment was had for plaintiff, and the defendant company, now plaintiff in error, brings the matter up on error to this court. The cause of action of defendant in error is shown by his amended petition, filed in this court after the removal, to be as follows:

“For that whereas, heretofore, to wit, on the 18th day of August, 1893, plaintiff was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Thorwegan v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Pinkerton v. LedouxSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Louisville & N. R. v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
  5. Texas & P. R. v. BryantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hodges v. KimballCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API