Legal Opinion

Floyd E. Cumbey v. Larry Meachum, Director, Gary Maynard, Warden, and Sharon Hartless

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 10, 1982No. 81-2467PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Per curiam

This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff, Floyd E. Cumbey, appeals the district court’s dismissal of the complaint he brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the use of female guards at the state prison where he is incarcerated violates his constitutional right to privacy. We vacate in part and remand.

The plaintiff is incarcerated at the Joseph Harp Correctional…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Carey v. Population Services InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Robert Michenfelder v. George Sumner Lieutenant Koon C/o Horn C/o Leslie Sgt Jenae Holmes Sgt Stuffelbeam James ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Colbruno v. KesslerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  4. Hovater v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Covino v. PatrissiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API