Legal Opinion
Raynor v. Raynor
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided May 10, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from Taylor District Court. — Hon. R. O. Henry,. Judge. Tins is an action in equity, and it involves the ownership and possession of a farm. There was a decree for' the plaintiffs. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.
The appeal was submitted to the court for its decision on the thirtieth day of October, 1888. At the same time, and in connection with the general submission of the cause, there was a motion by appellee to affirm taken with the case. No brief nor argument *283upon the merits of the appeal was filed nor submitted by either party. In this state of the record the decree of the district court must be affirmed. Without a brief of points or an argument by appellants we assume that they have abandoned their appeal.
Affirmed.
2Cited by5 opinions
- City of Albia v. StephensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Deaton v. HollingsheadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- Aetna State Bank v. FremmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Benedict v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Gordon-Van Tine Co. v. SergeantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932