Northwestern Fruit Co. v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN RE CERTAIN DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PRICE, District Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Defendants impose a cooling and palletizing charge when they sell cantaloupes to purchasers, and in the majority of sales to purchasers the cooling and palletizing charge is separately “broken out”, in the invoice to the Purchaser, as well as arithmetically included in the “bottom line” paid by the canteloupe purchaser.
2. In all but rare instances the cooling and palletizing charge was standard in amount in sales to purchasers. Defendants have not contested…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Knevelbaard Dairies v. Kraft Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In re Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013