Abrams v. Templeton
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Hearn, Judge:
This case involves the construction of a 1914 will which violates the rule against perpetuities. Pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 27-6-60(B) (1991), the trial judge inserted a savings clause into a provision of the will to prevent a forfeiture. We affirm as modified.
The testator, Mary Ann Taylor Ramage, executed her will in 1914 and died in 1915. She was survived by her husband Frank, a son Albert, and various grandchildren. The testator’s daughter, Alma Templeton, predeceased her, but left five surviving children: Frank, Bob, Charlie, Grace and Anna. In her will, the testator…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Meier v. MeierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- Waller v. WallerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
- In re Malone's EstateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1884
3Cited by6 opinions
- Queen's Grant II Horizontal Property Regime v. Greenwood Development Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Commonwealth v. PerezFairfax County Circuit Court · 1997
- Debra Scott MackUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
- Harrell v. GradyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Jinks v. Sea Pines Resort LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.