Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Templeton

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 6, 1995No. 2410PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hearn, Judge:

This case involves the construction of a 1914 will which violates the rule against perpetuities. Pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 27-6-60(B) (1991), the trial judge inserted a savings clause into a provision of the will to prevent a forfeiture. We affirm as modified.

The testator, Mary Ann Taylor Ramage, executed her will in 1914 and died in 1915. She was survived by her husband Frank, a son Albert, and various grandchildren. The testator’s daughter, Alma Templeton, predeceased her, but left five surviving children: Frank, Bob, Charlie, Grace and Anna. In her will, the testator…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meier v. MeierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  2. Waller v. WallerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  3. In re Malone's EstateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1884

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Queen's Grant II Horizontal Property Regime v. Greenwood Development Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. PerezFairfax County Circuit Court · 1997
  3. Debra Scott MackUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
  4. Harrell v. GradyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Jinks v. Sea Pines Resort LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API