Legal Opinion

Dishman v. Pitts

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 6, 1961No. Record 5183PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtI’Anson, J.

The plaintiff, Thomas J. Pitts, administrator of the estate of Thomas Linwood Pitts, deceased, instituted this action against the defendants J. S. Dishman, administrator of the estate of Robert Alan Agnew, and Orten Dewey Haislip, Royal B. Harris, L. J. Long, and Hespenheide & Thompson, Inc., seeking damages for the wrongful death of his decedent. It was alleged in the motion for judgment that Agnew, driver of the automobile in which Pitts was riding as a guest passenger at the time of his death, was guilty of gross negligence, and that the other defendants were guilty of simple or ordinary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hackley v. RobeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  2. Richter v. SeawellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
  3. Smith v. TurnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  4. Keen v. HarmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  5. Alspaugh v. DiggsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Russell T. Fitzgerald v. Preston C. Manning, Jr., M. D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  2. Grasty v. TannerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
  3. Spurlin, Administratrix v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  4. Commonwealth v. GiddensSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018
  5. Bond v. JoynerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API