Legal Opinion

Tate v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 31, 1915PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendant from Ferguson, J., at January Term, 1915, of "WarreN.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

This is an action to enjoin, and also to recover damages for, the blocking of a “crossing” by the defendant’s train near Nor-lina, N. C. In February, 1912, the defendant purchased 60 acres of land from W. R. Creed & Co. in order to enlarge its yards at Norlina, and soon thereafter constructed five tracks across the same in pursuance of that purpose.

The plaintiffs, prior to the purchase of this land by the defendant, had a contract with said W. R. Creed & Co. for handling timber on a 2,400-acre tract of land on the south side of the defendant’s track. The planing mill of the plaintiffs to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Raper v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. Goforth v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Herndon v. Durham & Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McMillan v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API