Towler v. State Highway Department
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
1. The principal question for decision is whether the condemnor can, as was attempted in the case sub judice, dismiss its appeal and entire proceeding instituted under power of eminent domain, after the appraisers have returned their appraisal awarding the condemnee just compensation for his property, and in that manner avoid liability for the amount awarded the condemnee? The epochal case of Woodside v. City of Atlanta, 214 Ga. 75 (103 S. E. 2d 108) holds that the time of "taking” in cases where the right of eminent domain is exercised is when the condemnor interferes with…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Woodside v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Thomas v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. MooneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Dobson v. Truscon Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
3Cited by7 opinions
- R. E. Adams Properties, Inc. v. City of GainesvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Housing Authority of Atlanta v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Taylor v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Gatefield Corp. v. Gwinnett CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- State Highway Department v. Farmers Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.