Legal Opinion

Schomaker v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 8, 1984No. WD 35153PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERREY, Judge.

Claimant for unemployment compensation appeals from a judgment by the circuit court, in favor of defendants, which affirmed the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. Claimant *451maintains that the circuit court erroneously affirmed the commission’s decision because that decision is unsupported by competent and substantial evidence. Claimant also maintains that the circuit court erroneously assessed costs against her. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed in part, and reversed in part.

The following statement of facts recognizes that courts reviewing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chemtech Industries, Inc. v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Woolridge v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Bergmann v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Figas v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Price v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Geiken v. Lutheran Home for the Aged Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  3. Eiler v. South Dakota Department of Labor & Regulation, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Sokol v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Sokol v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API