Legal Opinion

Hypolite v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 23, 1983No. 68176PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for forgery. Punishment was assessed at eight years.

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion was signed and presented by counsel and personally approved by appellant. The motion, however, was not notarized, as previously required by decisions of this Court. Ex parte Trisler, 605 S.W.2d 619 (Tex.Cr.App.1980). Today we overrule that line of cases and hold that a motion to dismiss an appeal signed by defendant and his attorney is sufficient. The old rule is without legal or rational foundation for the reasons stated in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte TrislerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Conners v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  2. Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
  3. Alphonso Boutire v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2022
  4. Andrew D. Brigham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018
  5. Chace Wilkinson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API