Legal Opinion

In re Rogers & Woodward

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided September 8, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

WHEELER, District Judge.

The bankrupts had a lease of land: “To have and to hold the same, with all the appurtenances thereunto belonging, until requested to vacate by the party of the first part upon three months’ notice, commencing on the 18th day of October, 1900, to be occupied by said party of the second part for the erection of a building to be used as a shoe store, subject to the payment of a rent of one hundred dollars in monthly installments,” with covenants for quiet enjoyment, for occupation and payment of the rent, with a right to re-enter and vacate the lease on nonpayment for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. FairbanksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1903
  2. McLoud v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1898
  3. Stafford v. AdairSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Lincoln National Bank & Trust Co. v. NathanIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Little v. National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  4. Doughty v. Rockingham Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API