Henderson v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
Appellant Jess Henderson relies upon five points for reversal of his conviction of the offense of delivery of a controlled substance, heroin. They are:
I. The Court erred in refusing to quash the indictment.
II. The Court erred in refusing to grant a mistrial.
III. The Court erred in refusing to grant a directed verdict.
IV. The Court erred in refusing to give defendant’s requested Instructions No. 1 and 3.
V. The Court erred in refusing to grant a new trial.
We find no merit in any of them.
I. Appellant was indicted by a grand jury. He was charged with unlawfully…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HarvardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- United States v. Marie Moses, Alias Marie KellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Sweatt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- People v. LindseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Abdullah v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- David v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Tyler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Ash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Haynie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.