Legal Opinion

Henderson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 14, 1974No. CR 73-129PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Appellant Jess Henderson relies upon five points for reversal of his conviction of the offense of delivery of a controlled substance, heroin. They are:

I. The Court erred in refusing to quash the indictment.

II. The Court erred in refusing to grant a mistrial.

III. The Court erred in refusing to grant a directed verdict.

IV. The Court erred in refusing to give defendant’s requested Instructions No. 1 and 3.

V. The Court erred in refusing to grant a new trial.

We find no merit in any of them.

I. Appellant was indicted by a grand jury. He was charged with unlawfully…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HarvardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  2. United States v. Marie Moses, Alias Marie KellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  3. Sweatt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  4. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  5. People v. LindseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Abdullah v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. David v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Tyler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Ash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Haynie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API