Legal Opinion

The Teviotdale

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1909No. 31PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Admiralty. .On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, District Judge.

Carlsen, the libelant, has brought this suit to recover damages for the loss of his fingers, which were frosted while raising the national ensign on a British vessel here in port on the 16th of February, 1904. He alleges that this injury was the fault of the officers of the Teviotdale. He was a young man, between 18 and 19 years of age, and was aboard as a seaman at £2. 5s. per month. On the morning of the above date, about 7 o’clock, at the command of and in company with one of the officers, Carlsen went on deck to hoist the national flag. In his effort to do so he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. The IroquoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. The MarsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907
  4. McCarron v. Dominion Atlantic Ry. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1905
  5. Southern Pac. Co. v. Western Pac. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The Bouker No. 2Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  2. Madsen v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API