Legal Opinion

Shoemake v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 8, 1969No. 53649PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENLEY, Chief Justice.

Action by St. Francois County and the Judges of its county court (hereinafter referred to as the County or plaintiffs) to condemn for park and recreational purposes *333land owned by defendants. Commissioners assessed defendants’ damages for the taking at $51,600. Defendants excepted to this award and the issue of damages was tried before a jury in Jefferson County on a change of venue. The jury assessed defendants’ damages at $100,378.00 and judgment was entered in accordance with the verdict. The County’s motion for new trial was overruled and it appealed.

Plaintiffs brief…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago, Sante Fe & California Railway Co. v. McGrewSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. LangleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. St. Louis & Kansas City Railway Co. v. EbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. LindleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. SheetsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. STATE EX REL. MO. HIGHWAY AND TRANSP. COM'N v. VittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Berkeley School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. VittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API