Legal Opinion
Connolly Development, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 1976No. S.F. 23225PublishedCited by 1 opinion
, Counsel Norman S. Stimmel and Russell H. McLain for Real Party in Interest.
1Opinion of the Court
17 Cal.3d 803 (1976)
553 P.2d 637
132 Cal. Rptr. 477
CONNOLLY DEVELOPMENT, INC., et al., Petitioners,
v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MERCED COUNTY, Respondent; DIAMOND INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Real Party in Interest.
Docket No. S.F. 23225.
Supreme Court of California.
August 31, 1976.
COUNSEL
Orr, Wendel & Lawlor and Eugene K. Lawlor for Petitioners.
Miller, Starr & Regalia, Harry D. Miller and Cecily A. Drucker as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioners.
No appearance for Respondent.
Norman S. Stimmel and Russell H. McLain for Real Party in Interest.
Munns, Kofford, Hoffman, Hunt & Throckmorton, Gordon Hunt,…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Goncalves Ex Rel. Goncalves v. Rady Children's Hospital San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017