Legal Opinion

Falcon v. Boyer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 2, 1913PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court. — Hon. M. P. Smith, Judge. Action in equity to restrain the defendant from diverting tbe waters of a running stream from its natural course on his land to the land of the plaintiff and for damages. Judgment and decree for the plaintiff. —

1Opinion of the CourtGtaynor, J.

— The defendant, Boyer, is the owner of the S. E. ^4 of section 27. The plaintiff, Falcon, is the owner of the S. W. % of 26 and the N. E. % of section 34, and each was the owner of said land at the time of the happening of the matters complained of. That what is called by the plaintiff a branch of Indian creek, runs’ across plaintiff’s land in section 26 and crosses the line between 26 and 27 about 27 rods north of the southeast corner of 27, passes through 27 in a southwesterly direc*747tiou into section 34, and crosses the line between 27' and 34, 27 rods from the southeast corner of 27. That…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dorr v. SimmersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Wharton v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  3. Vogt v. City of GrinnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Weiss v. Oregon Iron & Steel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Allen v. StowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Chowchilla Farms Inc. v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Iowa Natural Resources Council v. Van ZeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  3. United Railroads of San Francisco v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Hunt v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  5. Independent School District of Ionia v. DeWildeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API