Legal Opinion

Mahoning Coal R. v. Higgins

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 25, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

This is an action to recover the amount of federal capital stock taxes paid under protest' by the plaintiff for the tax years ending June 30, 1937, June’ 30, 1938 and June 30, 1939, in the respective sums of $18,627.67, $19,240.17 and $18,337.49, including interest. The declared value of plaintiff’s capital stock was $17,500,000, for 1937 and 1938, and $17,727,877.88 for 1939. The tax was 1%.

In its returns the plaintiff claimed exemption from the tax on the ground that it was not carrying on or doing business during the tax years in question. The Commissioner denied…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Von Baumbach v. Sargent Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. McCoach v. Minehill & Schuylkill Haven RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Edwards v. Chile Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Anderson v. Morris & E. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 233-5 West 125th Street Corp. v. HoeyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API