Legal Opinion

United States v. Esequicio Londondio

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2005No. 04-3579, 04-3580, 04-3582, 04-3584 and 04-3585PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.

This case arises from a cocaine transaction that occurred in the Minneapolis area in early November 2003. As a result of the transaction, six men were indicted for conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000), and aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000). Prior to trial, two of the men, Nicholas Castillo and Esequicio Londondio, pleaded guilty to the conspiracy charge in exchange for the government’s agreement to dismiss the aiding and abetting charge. The remaining four men,…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Esequicio Londondio, United States of America v. Carlos Alberto Gonzalez-Rodriguez, United States of America v. Pablo Jaramillo, United States of America v. Juan Fernando Palacio, United States of America v. Nahum AlcantoraCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API