Legal Opinion
Keefe v. Broderick
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided January 16, 1939No. 3012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAHONEY, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Alice S. Keefe, Gertrude S. Keefe, and Mary R. Keefe, all of the District of Rhode Island, have brought this action of assumpsit against Joseph V. Broderick, Collector of Internal Revenue of the United States of America for the District of Rhode Island, for the recovery of certain estate taxes in the sum of $3,-668.54, allegedly illegally assessed against the estate of John W. Keefe, deceased, and paid by said plaintiffs as residuary legatees.
A claim for refund of said taxes has been made according to the provisions of the law and the regulations of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chase National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Helvering v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Bingham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Gould v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bowers v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
- Golden v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Bowers v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
- Golden v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940