Legal Opinion

Boise Payette Lumber Co. v. Sarret

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWm. E. Lee, J.

— This is an appeal by J. M. Stevens from a judgment in favor of respondent and against Sarret & Stevens, a copartnership. It appears from the record that, during the years 1919 and 1920, certain goods, wares and merchandise, consisting of lumber, fence posts, barbed wire, nails, corrugated iron, paint, coal, etc., were sold and delivered by respondent to the firm of Sarret & Stevens, a copartnership engaged in the business of raising and selling sheep. The purchases were made by Sarret in the name of the copartnership. It does not appear that appellant Stevens was informed that the purchases…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Jones, Newton & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. First National Bank of Dixon v. SpanglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Merrill v. O'BryanWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Standard Wagon Co. v. Few & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Franklin v. HoadleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Russell v. Boise Cold Storage Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Kallash v. ClaarIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Hobbs v. Virginia National BankCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API