Legal Opinion

Pierson v. Hart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.

This was an action by the appellees, as plaintiffs, against the appellant and John R. Reeves, John R. Johnson, Ann Snow and Augustus W. Hough, as defendants, to foreclose a certain mortgage, and to correct a mistake in a certain promissory note, the payment of which note, it was alleged, had been secured by the mortgage.

The defendants demurred to the complaint; the demurrer was overruled, and they excepted.

The appellant, Morris Pierson, separately answered, and issues were joined thereon by proper replies.

The other defendants, Reeves, Johnson, Snow and Hough, were then called and defaulted.

*255The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reeder v. MarandaIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Harlan v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Herzogg v. ChambersIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hammon v. SextonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Field v. BurtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. State ex rel. Young v. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Hendricks v. State ex rel. HuffIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Hendricks v. State ex rel. HuffIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API