Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Martin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 5, 1937PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

I. Certain non-resident defendants were served with process outside the state and have entered no appearance. No valid decree in the suit determining their rights can be made. They are beyond the court’s jurisdiction and have not submitted to it. No. conditions of status exist, and no property or res in which they may be interested and over which the court has jurisdiction is a subject-matter of the suit. While a debt may have the situs of the debtor and be property there (Robinson v. Carroll, 87 N. H. 114), the issue here is not of the rights of claimants to property but whether the claim of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Loftus v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Sleeper v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Allor v. DubayMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. CONDENSER SERVICE, ETC., CO., INC. v. American Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Myers v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  4. Forbes v. BoyntonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  5. McDaniel v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API