Legal Opinion

American Soda Fountain Co. v. Spring Water Carbonating Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 6, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

This is an action upon an account annexed, only three items of which were disputed, they being items based on a written order for one hundred special drought arms to be manufactured “as per drawing submitted.” At the trial it was admitted that one hundred special drought arms manufactured according to the “drawing submitted” had been delivered to the defendant, and that $272 of the purchase price had been paid by it on account. But the defendant contended that the contract was procured by fraud and that it had been avoided on that ground. It set this up in defense to the action for the unpaid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chatham Furnace Co. v. MoffattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. McCusker v. GeigerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Goodwin v. Massachusetts Loan & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  4. Adams v. CollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Friedman v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Federal Coal & Coke Co. v. CoryellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API