Legal Opinion

Riddle v. MacFadden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 7, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Felicite Skiff Riddle, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Flew-York on the 4th day of April, 1906, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the FTew York Special Term, sustaining the defendants’ separate amended demurrers to the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

MoLaughlin, J.:

Each defendant demurred tó the complaint on the ground that causes of action were improperly united. The court at Special Term so held and plaintiff appeals from the interlocutory judgment.

The complaint charges in substance that the defendant MacFadden, at the times stated, was doing business under the name of • “ Physical .Culture Publishing Company,” and was the owner and publisher of certain magazines named ; that the defendant Whit? *354was, during such times, a photographer and that plaintiff procured him to take her photograph, for which she paid him a stipulated price, it…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. WanamakerNew York Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Jacob v. SchiffNew York Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API